7 ways to address PFAS contamination in Michigan

Michigan is learning about its PFAS environmental contamination, discovering how far it reaches and how many residents it affects.
But as officials target limiting human exposure, they’re also looking at a set of solutions: more money, site work and regulations.
At risk: The drinking water for 9 million Michigan residents who depend on the government to identify public health risks and initiate protection for people and the environment.
PFAS chemicals also have been found above 70-ppt in 14 wells near Grayling and one well near Wurtsmith.
Carol Isaacs, director of Michigan’s PFAS Action and Response Team, said the EPA guidelines need to be a national priority.
But the role of the federal government is directly tied to the problem: In many cases, it’s the polluter.
Chemical-laden fish can be found on ‘do not eat’ advisories across the state, with PFAS listed as the primary concern for a total of 59 mentions in Michigan water ways – most in Southeast Lower Michigan.
Those are all concerns raised by people who are looking at the problem and trying to mobilize a response that doesn’t further hurt communities.
They all seem to agree that the municipalities affected by PFAS could benefit from a more coordinated effort to consider what needs to be communicated about contamination – and where existing state economic development efforts could align with MPART’s findings.
PFAS is Michigan’s next water crisis

Learn More