Drought leads to contamination in Duncan’s water supply
-by Silas Allen, originally published on October 6, 2014
DUNCAN — If you’re spending time in Duncan soon, consider packing bottled water.
Officials notified residents that the city’s drinking water had violated federal purity standards. City officials say the problem is the result of a prolonged drought that has left city reservoirs several feet below normal.
Results of water quality tests in Duncan between July 2013 and July 2014 showed elevated levels of trihalomethanes, a type of contaminant that appears as a byproduct when water is chlorinated. Although the contaminant levels exceeded standards set by the federal Environmental Protection Agency, the city’s water is safe to drink for most people, said Scott Vaughn, the city’s public works director.
“You don’t need to boil the water, for instance,” Vaughn said. “It was not and is not an immediate health concern.”
Some people who drink water with elevated levels of trihalomethanes for many years could develop liver, kidney or central nervous system problems, according to the EPA. Drinking water with high levels of trihalomethanes every day for decades also could cause a slight risk of cancer, the agency reports.
Although the immediate risk is small, Duncan city officials advised elderly residents, those with severely weakened immune systems and parents of infants to consult a doctor about possible health effects.
Vaughn said the problem is because of a serious drought that has gripped Stephens County for the past four years. Duncan averages about 38 inches of rain per year, according to the Oklahoma Climatological Survey. But the city’s total rainfall has fallen below that average for several years, the survey reports.
In 2011 and 2012, the city received about 15 inches of rain for the entire year — less than half of what it could expect to receive in a typical year.
Although the city has fared somewhat better since then, the rainfall hasn’t been enough to make up for the damage that was done in 2011 and 2012, Vaughn said. Waurika Lake, the city’s primary source of drinking water, stands about 32 percent of its normal capacity. As water levels plummeted, water quality suffered, Vaughn said, leading to the increased levels of trihalomethanes.
Another part of the problem stems, ironically, from the success of the city’s water conservation efforts. As reservoir levels dropped, city officials implemented water conservation measures. The city is under Stage 4 water restrictions, which limit outdoor watering to one day a week.
Eagle Mountain residents told not to drink the water
-by Barbara Christiansen, originally posted on September 29, 2014
EAGLE MOUNTAIN — Residents have been cautioned not to use city water for drinking, cooking, showering or brushing teeth.
Monday afternoon, a resident walking in the foothills discovered a breach at one of the city’s water storage tanks and notified city workers that a lock had been cut at the access to the tank. Law enforcement officials are investigating. The tank was immediately isolated and the water is not entering the city’s system.
Samples of the water from the breached tank have been sent to a laboratory and the results are expected back by Tuesday evening.
“We feel we are being overly cautious,” public works director Dave Norman said. “We are hopeful that everything comes up clean. We don’t have any reason to believe there is a problem.”
The approximately 25,000 residents in 6,600 households were sent notices from an email list the city had compiled. There were also notices on Facebook, Twitter and the city website. They sent notices to the Utah County Health Department and the Utah Division of Drinking Water.
“We don’t know if there is any cause for concern,” said Linda Peterson, the Eagle Mountain public information director. “As soon as we get the test results in, we will provide updates on any type of mandatory restrictions.”
Eagle Mountain has five water storage tanks. The affected one held 2 million gallons at capacity. The others are a 2 million, two 1 million and a 600,000-gallon tank.
“We will be notifying people, probably late Tuesday afternoon or early Tuesday evening, Norman said.
Maine drinking water tests positive for dangerous levels of fluoride
Published on August 25, 2014
A new study out of Maine suggests that residents across the New England state are regularly subjected to drinking water containing double the amount of fluoride considered to be dangerous by federal guidelines.
Residents from across the Pine Tree State were asked to voluntarily take samples from the private wells they rely on for drinking water, and ten different towns—including eight within a single county—tested higher than hoped for.
Scientific American published the results of the study last week, and the article’s author, Dina Fine Maron, wrote that the details suggest many Mainers are introducing dangerous amounts of fluoride to their bodies due to an absence of regulation.
According to Maron, most of the state relies on private wells when it comes to getting water. Unlike public water sources, however, the water that Mainers drink every single day is spared stringent testing.
“Like the majority of the state, many of Dedham’s denizens rely on private wells for the water they drink, bathe in and perhaps use to make infant milk formula. But the water trickling from the tap—unlike water from its public water sources—goes untested and is not subject to any state or federal guidelines,” Maron wrote. “And although homeowners are encouraged to get their water regularly tested to ensure that worrisome levels of bacteria or naturally occurring minerals have not crept in, many residents do not follow that advice.”
“Yet newly available data, released in recent months, indicates that in some 10 communities in the state wells harbor dangerously high levels of fluoride. In some cases, the wells contain more than double the level that the US Environmental Protection Agency has deemed the acceptable maximum exposure level,” she added.
In the town that Maron made a point of particularly addressing, Dedham, 37.8 percent of the wells tested to be well beyond the state’s guidelines with regards to fluoride concentration, according to the Scientific America report. Although public treatment plants regularly add fluoride to water sources in order to prevent tooth decay, an abundance of the element can be enough to cause brittle bones or, according to some studies, decreased intelligence. In both China and Iran, for example, researchers have suggested that dangerously high levels of fluoride concentration are responsible for lower IQ scores.
“The sort of levels we’re talking about that are high in China are the sort of levels we see in some private wells,” Andrew Smith, Maine state toxicologist, told Scientific America.
According to Robert Marvinney, the director of the Maine Geological Survey, the reason for abnormally high levels of fluoride within the state is a direct result of the granite found in the earth, particularly in Hancock County where Dedham, ME is located.
That isn’t to say that Dedham is an outlier, however; Moran relied on all samples that were voluntarily submitted, and in turn was able to analyze data from around 25 percent of towns across the state. Of those, 10 demonstrated levels considered to be dangerous.
“I’m certain the number of wells that have this problem is smaller than those that have high arsenic, but this reinforces the need for people to test their wells,” added Marvinney.
With Uranium Poisoning Wells, Navajos Must Drive Miles To Get Drinking Water
Uranium’s deadly flow
THE NAVAJO NATION ESTIMATES THAT 54,000 NAVAJOS HAUL WATER FROM UNREGULATED WELLS AND STOCK PONDS NUMBERING IN THE LOW THOUSANDS.
BLACK FALLS — Teeth clack involuntarily and tools rattle on the floor board under the backseat of Milton Yazzie’s Silverado as he and his frail mother bounce along the washboard-creased dirt road from their home.
For mile after dusty mile, rise after rutted descent, the truck rocks toward the dry river and then Flagstaff, the screech of Led Zeppelin on the radio inside and of a high-desert wind outside. Three plastic barrels bounce along in the truck bed.
It’s water day on the reservation.
Twice a week, the Yazzies, 57-year-old Milton and 83-year-old Della, come down off their lonely hill on the Navajo Reservation’s western side and point themselves toward the city for the clean water they need to keep living. For ages, they drank from a well less than a mile from their home. Then they learned that poison lurked there.
Uranium is gurgling up all over Navajo country.
At least three Yazzies have died of kidney ailments, a common result of chronic exposure to uranium. Federal environmental officials warned against drinking more. Milton learned to conserve, using an outhouse across their driveway and leaving the tank-supplied indoor plumbing to Della, because of her failing eyesight.
He begged the tribe, the feds, anyone who would listen, to build a pipeline through the sparsely populated Black Falls area, southeast of Cameron.
“I’ve been working so hard all these years to get good drinking water,” he said, “and it never came.”
Though they live out of anyone’s sight, the Yazzies are far from alone in their hardship.
When World War II spawned the nation’s nuclear program and then a nuclear-arms race, companies came digging. They unleashed a radioactive element that would leach into wells and springs. Not until decades later — and decades after many of the mining companies departed — would Painted Desert inhabitants know the real hazards left to them. Even today, true cleanup is in its infancy, with an uncertain growth chart.
The Navajo Nation estimates that 54,000 Navajos haul water from unregulated wells and stock ponds numbering in the low thousands, potentially putting them at risk for contamination from previously untested sources.
Thousands more, like the Yazzies, know the poison is in their communal wells. Water is the first thing on their minds whenever they leave home.
Parts of the reservation, especially in and around towns, are on treated, piped water systems, often coming from pristine lakes. Their water is good.
But in the remote sheepherding hills beyond the wired world, springs and windmills are the only sources. More than 10 percent of 240 unregulated sources that the Environmental Protection Agency tested were found to have pollution exceeding federal drinking-water standards for uranium or radioactive particles.
Across the hills southeast of the Yazzie home, Box Springs is one such source that has poisoned many unsuspecting people for decades.
Not far from Grand Falls on the Little Colorado, the well is tucked in a red sandstone arroyo with bleached soils and a big cottonwood tree that conspicuously advertises the rare occurrence of water.
The federal drinking-water limit is 30 micrograms — millionths of grams — of uranium per liter. Box Springs tested at 35 micrograms. It’s less than some others, which tested as high as 700 micrograms. But over a lifetime, the exposure accumulates.
Most residents, but not all, have stopped using the water.
The government drilled a test well by the river to replace Box Springs, but that water was too salty.
Since 2008, the EPA, along with Indian Health Service and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, put $27 million into upgrading reservation water delivery. Fourteen projects, when complete, will pipe water to more than 800 homes. One of the projects also enhances water quality for about 1,000 homes that already had running water.
Down dirt roads like the Yazzies’, or the dead end at Box Springs, building a web of pipes to sparse pockets of homes is cost-prohibitive. Instead, the EPA paid for a trucking program that sends four tanker trucks to various meeting places once a week. The trucks can serve up to 3,000 homes.
Yazzie has waited in line before, and has been turned away when the water ran out. He no longer relies on it.
Now, the most basic requirement for survival takes planning and gasoline.
Wool doesn’t pay the bills. Yazzie earns a small income acting as his mother’s home health aide. Those weekly checks plus his late father’s pension enable the pair to keep topping off the tank and filling up barrels in town and allow mother to live in the land of her youth and keep son connected to his ancestors.
“As long as I can still haul water,” he said, “I’ll stay here till I die.”
In winter, the drive to Flagstaff can take two hours or more in each direction. That’s if muddy roads and a strong flow in the Little Colorado River keep him from crossing and force him to detour through the village of Leupp.
For such eventualities, he stocks up on bottled water whenever it is on sale at Flagstaff supermarkets. He can’t afford to be completely out when storms blow across the desert as they did last winter.
“We didn’t go nowhere for two weeks,” said Yazzie, a self-described former wild child in cargo shorts, high-top sneakers, sweatshirt and bandanna.
In the dry season, it’s about an hour to town.
On a June weekday morning, he loaded his three 55-gallon drums onto the pickup, draining what little was left in one into a Coleman cooler before rolling toward Flagstaff.
“I can’t waste no water,” he said.
On this day, the river was dry, the 50-mile path to town clear. He helped Della into the passenger seat at 10:25 a.m., and rattled out the road to Black Falls crossing, dust on black rock. They rolled onto blacktop and on through Wupatki National Monument, past haunting ancient Puebloan rock ruins that overlook the rolling plains.
At noon, Yazzie parked outside Flagstaff City Hall, where his mother handed him a $20 bill to reload their water account with a clerk inside. Each barrel subtracts about 40 cents from the account.
From there, they drove several blocks to a city pump, where an overhead hose hung from a crane arm. A city inspection report listed scheduled testing results — including no violations for uranium.
Yazzie swung the steel arm over his truck and dropped the hose into one barrel. Within about five minutes, all three barrels were full, and Yazzie tied off their caps with plastic bags.
He went searching for cheap gas at Fry’s, where he noticed the price had gone up 2 cents a gallon, to $3.49, since his visit a few days earlier. Inside the grocery store, he gathered some chicken quarters, eggs, fruit and ice to keep them on the journey home, then two 24-packs of bottled water at $2.47 apiece.
After lunch at a Chinese buffet, Yazzie perused Sam’s Club for some bread and melons, then headed for home, arriving just after 4, about 120 new miles on the truck. Before unloading at home, he switched to an older pickup and drove a half-mile to fill a couple of drums at his former watering hole — a well that the EPA told him had elevated uranium at “borderline” dangerous levels. He still uses that water for his livestock and vegetable garden.
Studies have shown that some of the radioactivity in exposed foods, particularly livestock organs, can pass to humans. But the dose from this well is less than others on the reservation.
Yazzie’s water-hauling regimen is beyond what some others in need are able or willing to endure every week. The EPA noted in a 2013 report on the water upgrades that some residents had reopened capped wells and started using contaminated water.
One of them is Rolanda Tohannie. She lives just over a rise from Box Springs, one of the sources that the EPA closed.
“Most of my family is gone,” she said. “They all died of kidney failure. They blame that on the water.”
She has had tumors removed from her stomach and the back of her head.
“I believe they have taken out all of the uranium in me,” she said.
Still, she said, the water tastes better than bottled, and it’s most convenient to use what’s readily available. So she routinely uses Box Springs water for washing and gardening, and sometimes for coffee or drinking.
“It’s refreshing,” she said. “It makes the coffee taste better. It’s an artesian well.”
Tohannie, 51, tried having family members haul water from Leupp, but it was too salty.
The water-hauling trucks are not convenient, and people are frequently confused about when they arrive, Tohannie said. She is on disability for issues unrelated to uranium, and cannot make frequent trips to Flagstaff.
“I don’t have a choice” about using the water, she said.
Linda Begay, 48, believes Box Springs uranium contamination caused her mother’s cancer and her own bladder infections and hematuria — blood in the urine and a possible sign of kidney problems. She now meets the tanker truck weekly to supply her family’s home and stock troughs, as well as her parents’ nearby home and hogan.
Her grandmother died in the 1980s of stomach cancer. That was the start of painful and mysterious ailments afflicting the family.
Her dad has skin lesions that are flaky and sometimes gooey. Her mom has suffered colon cancer, and had a 2-inch piece of intestine removed in a Phoenix hospital.
Her husband, an asphalt worker with long daily commutes, is healthy. But he grew up as a foster child in Utah, California and Colorado, away from the poison.
“I have the bladder infections all my life,” Begay said.
Of 19 households in the surrounding hills, she said, half have been visited by cancer.
“I think I’m going to get cancer,” she said.
The tribe’s 4,000-gallon water truck arrives early on Mondays at a scheduled gathering spot, and stays until 11a.m. or until it is empty, whichever comes first. Begay can fetch 250 gallons at a time in her pickup, and some weeks is able to return three times before the water is gone.
She returns home to dump some of the water in a holding tank, and some in the troughs where every evening dozens of dog-chaperoned sheep return from the parched range to the corrals behind the house.
It’s enough, with strict conservation measures such as shutting off the water while scrubbing in the shower.
But if the truck breaks down and doesn’t make it, she must drive a couple of hours to Flagstaff for water for her sheep. She feels safer drinking Flagstaff water, and often retrieves bottles of it when she is in town.
Begay’s two sons, Andre and Quentin, are in the military. Her daughter, Ashley, is at college in Durango, Colo.
When they return, as she expects they will, they won’t live on the homestead.
But for her, home is home, regardless.
“I don’t want to leave this place,” she said. “It’s not going to be as good (elsewhere). It feels like home, even with all this uranium.
“I just feel like if I keep my shoes on and drink water from Flagstaff, I’ll be OK.”
As she discussed her predicament late last winter, a neighbor from down the road called to ask whether the Little Colorado was passable by truck that day. He was heading to Flagstaff for water.
So why don’t they follow the clean water and move to the city?
“We (wouldn’t) know what to do,” Yazzie said. “We can’t raise sheep out in the middle of the street.”
Without him and others who feel that way, he sees little hope that anyone will restore or protect the land.
Around a bend from his house at Black Falls, near where he pumps suspect water for his sheep, he has painted a wooden sign warning thieves about taking massive hunks of petrified wood from the hillside. He has seen them do it before, using cranes to lift the valuable stone onto trucks.
He wants the land and its minerals intact, looking the way it did when his ancestors hid from Kit Carson’s army, the way it did when they returned after forced relocation to New Mexico.
“We are trying to live up to what they fought so hard for,” Yazzie said.
Why Do The Baffling Germans Bottle Out of Drinking Tap Water?
-By Brian Melican, originally posted on February 26, 2014
Our columnist explains why requesting a glass of nature’s finest could land you in very hot water with your host
If there’s one thing that everybody thinks they know about Germans, it’s that they’re green. Germans think they know this about themselves too, and can point to neighbour-shaming recycling figures and ambitious plans to switch entirely to renewable energy to prove it.
Then there’s the strength of the German Green Party, which regularly garners 10 per cent of the national vote, and the small everyday reminders that efficient resource use doesn’t automatically entail hair shirts and self-flagellation: just witness the nationwide deposit scheme in which a beer bottle is actually worth 0.08 euros (six pence) on returning it to the shop. Money for your empties: like so much out here, it’s a beer-drinker’s dream come true.
As a matter of fact, Germany’s green attitude is one of the things I find most attractive about it, and precisely because of this admiration, there are some inconsistencies about German environmental behaviour which really niggle me.
Like their annoying obsession with bottled water. Germany is a country with British levels of rainfall and a, well, German plumbing infrastructure. This happy coincidence means that, if there’s one natural resource Germans will not be running short on any time soon, it’s tap water, which is reflected in enviably low water rates. We pay around 15 euros per month (£12.35) as a two-person household, and enjoy deliciously high water quality.
And yet Germans refuse en masse to make use of this cheap, practical resource. Especially in middle-class homes, not having both still and fizzy bottled water, chilled, to offer guests is a faux-pas on the level of welcoming somebody into your home in Britain without having the necessaries to offer them a cup of tea.
This keeping-up-with-the-Schmidts attitude to H20 leads to truly ridiculous spectacles every Saturday morning, as couple after work-week-weary couple clogs up the supermarket till to pay top euro for crates of a substance they have in equal quality and all-but-unlimited measure at home. Then there’s the mass schlepping of said precious substance to their cars, with much huffing and puffing, followed by the positively Sisyphean task of hauling the whole load up several flights of stairs (city dwellers tend to live in blocks of flats). Call me crazy, but I prefer to save my shopping-run energy reserves for savoury, nutritious stuff that doesn’t come out of a tap in my kitchen – like milk, potatoes, or indeed beer (although I’m working on that last one).
While many Germans seem anxious to avoid tap water, most will drink it if pressed – either by me, or by an oncoming fit of dehydration of a hot Sunday afternoon when Lidl and Aldi’s water reserves are firmly behind closed shop shutters. Yet there is one group of Germans who would literally rather people thirsted to death than drink tap-water: restaurateurs.
In any country, there’s always a guaranteed way of getting your food spat on. In France, it’s finger-clicking and yelling “garçon” in an audibly English accent; in Ireland, it’s just being English. Yet the way to get flob on your Flammkuchen (pizza) in Germany is simply to ask for tap-water with your meal. In a German ordering situation, it’s one of the rudest things you can do (short of going all Basil Fawlty).
This comes from a fundamental difference of opinion about pricing and the role of water. In most countries, water is considered an essential accompaniment to food (in several, it is illegal to refuse it to guests in eateries); in Germany, it is considered a way to recoup costs on alluring prices for meals with which restaurant owners would otherwise be cutting their own throats. Especially when dining on an attractively priced midday offer, customers who do not order a beverage of some sort are probably costing more than they’re paying. Elsewhere, restaurants would rectify this by upping the price of their food; in Germany, the solution is to get arsey if the customer doesn’t play the game and order some form of high-margin liquid refreshment.
In fact, in general, the tap-water issue in Germany is a financial one. Drinking bottled water was once a way of displaying wealth, one that has become so culturally ingrained that the automatic mental response when someone insists on tap-water is to consider them a pfennig-pincher – rather than, say, someone who sees it as morally questionable to spend loads of money and emit huge amounts of carbon dioxide bottling and transporting water when it’s readily available everywhere: too much CO2 for H2O, if you like.
In fact, carbon emissions is where German inconsistencies with regards to the environment become quite flagrant: as the Green vote in Germany expands, so does the average engine rating on vehicles sold. Meanwhile, Angela Merkel’s government blocked tighter European emissions standards last year to favour the country’s high-horsepower car manufacturers – at precisely the same time as it was supposed to be formulating policies for the carbon-free energy switch.
If only the boffins at BMW could come up with a way of running luxury vehicles off of the gas bubbles in fizzy bottled water, this expat Swampy might finally be satisfied…
Water in America: Is It Safe to Drink?
-By Tim Friend for National Geographic, originally published on February 17, 2014
The West Virginia chemical spill brings attention to a broader national problem.
A chemical spill that left 300,000 residents of Charleston, West Virginia, without tap water last month is raising new concerns about the ability of the United States to maintain its high quality of drinking water.
While the U.S. has one of the safest water supplies in the world, experts say the Charleston contamination with a coal-washing chemical shows how quickly the trust that most Americans place in their drinking water can be shattered.
“We often don’t think about where our water comes from,” said Steve Fleischli, director and senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Water Program in Los Angeles. “Does it come from a nearby river or a lake, intermittent streams, isolated wetlands, or an aquifer? Yes, you may have a water treatment plant, but if your water source is not protected, people face a real risk.”
In Charleston on January 9, about 10,000 gallons of a little-known and unregulated chemical called 4-methylcyclohexane methanol (MCHM) leaked from an aboveground storage tank into the Elk River. The amount of the chemical overwhelmed the carbon filtration system in the West Virginia American Water treatment plant about a mile downstream. Within a week, more than 400 people were treated at hospitals for rashes, nausea, vomiting, and other symptoms.
West Virginia American Water decided by January 13 that the water was again safe to drink, because the concentration of MCHM had fallen below one part per million. But it soon emerged that there was little scientific information backing up that safety threshold, and this past week many West Virginians were still not drinking tap water. “I wouldn’t drink it if you paid me,” West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller told National Public Radio last Monday.
Leaky Ponds of Coal Ash
While Congress was holding hearings on the West Virginia incident, the next one happened. On February 2, up to 82,000 tons of toxic coal ash spilled into the Dan River, near the border of North Carolina and Virginia, from a pond at a closed Duke Energy power plant. This week state health officials warned people not to swim in the river or eat fish from it.
The Associated Press reported February 13 that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Raleigh has launched a criminal investigation into the spill, seeking records from Duke Energy and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources—which had sued Duke last August for unpermitted discharges at Dan River and five other power plants.
“When you burn coal you leave behind metals and radioactivity,” said Robert B. Jackson, an environmental scientist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. “The ash is quite toxic. The waste products we create to produce energy, the waste we generate every day, are a threat to drinking water quality.”
Coal ash contains arsenic, mercury, lead, thallium, and other dangerous contaminants. At power plants it is mixed with water, forming a slurry that is stored in large ponds. According to the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, 40 percent of the country’s coal ash ponds are located in the southeast and contain 118 billion gallons of toxic material. Most of these impoundments, like the one on the Dan River, are located near major waterways.
In 2008, the dike at an impoundment in eastern Tennessee failed at the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil Plant. More than 5.4 million cubic yards of coal ash spilled from the site and spread across more than 300 acres of land and water. Tests of nearby river water showed levels of lead and thallium exceeded safety limits for drinking water, but the TVA said at the time that the toxic metals were filtered out by water treatment processes. The TVA spent a year and a half cleaning up the sludge.
In 2000, the bottom of a coal ash pond in Kentucky crumbled and released an estimated 306 million gallons of slurry. Water supplies for 27,000 people were contaminated.
Following the Tennessee spill, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency identified 676 coal ash impoundments at 240 facilities, assigning a “high hazard” rating to 45 ponds. The rating indicates that a failure would probably cause loss of human life.
Droughts, Floods, and Hogs
Another threat, Jackson said, is severe weather. Research suggests that dry regions will become drier and wet regions wetter as a result of climate change. Both extremes pose significant challenges for maintaining safe drinking water.
Jackson pointed to a 1999 hurricane that flooded hog farms in North Carolina. “Hurricane Floyd came through and flushed the contents of the hog waste lagoons out into the streams and rivers,” he said. The result was widespread fecal contamination of drinking water. More than decade after Floyd, North Carolina still has more than 4,000 hog waste lagoons.
At the other extreme of the weather spectrum is drought. Laurel Firestone, founder of the Community Water Center, a nonprofit advocacy group based in Visalia, California, said the most severe drought in California history may have a dramatic effect on water quality.
In a 2012 report prepared for the California State Water Control Board, scientists from the University of California at Davis found that about 254,000 people in the Tulare Lake Basin and Salinas Valley are currently at risk for nitrate contamination of their drinking water. In one of the nation’s most productive farming regions, nitrates from heavily fertilized fields leach into the groundwater. “Many small communities cannot afford safe drinking water treatment,” the report said.
As a result of the current drought, farmers are having to rely on groundwater to irrigate their fields—which inevitably raises the concentration of nitrates in the water left in the ground. “The California drought is exacerbating problems that already existed,” Firestone said. “Those being affected first are people who depend on the shallow wells. They are canaries in the coal mine.” Exposures to high levels of nitrates can cause death, miscarriages, and blue baby syndrome, she said.
In general, Jackson said, and not just in California, “the most vulnerable group of people are those who get their water from a private water source. People who have private drinking water wells are far less protected than anyone else in the country. No one tests your water unless you pay for a test.”
Polluters ‘R Us
What worries Jackson and some other experts more than headline-making spills and weather is chronic pollution of a more insidious kind—from pharmaceuticals and personal care products, or PPCPs. Studies have shown that pharmaceuticals, especially antibiotics and steroids, are widely present in the nation’s water supply. We excrete them in our urine; our livestock do as well. Other chemicals from soaps, shampoos, and lotions get washed down the drains of our tubs and showers. Sewage treatment plants are not equipped to remove them. Some have been shown to disrupt the hormone system in fish.
The EPA states there are no known human health effects from low-level exposure to PPCPs in drinking water, “but special scenarios (one example being fetal exposure to low levels of medications that a mother would ordinarily be avoiding) require more investigation.”
“What we don’t know are the interactions of thousands of different compounds that are taking place in our lakes, streams, and aquifers,” said Jackson, who is studying the effects of some of the compounds on fish and mice. “When you have a spill like in West Virginia it’s terrible, but at least you know about it. The cases that may be more dangerous are the slow and steady spills and chemical reactions that we don’t know about.”
For municipal utilities, such new worries come at a very bad time. In the American Society of Civil Engineers 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, the nation’s drinking water infrastructure was given a D grade for aging pipes, some of which date back to the Civil War. “At the dawn of the 21st century, much of our drinking water infrastructure is nearing the end of its useful life,” the report stated. The American Water Works Association estimates there are 240,000 water-main breaks per year in the U.S. The investment needed to bring the nation’s waterworks up to speed has been estimated in the trillions of dollars.
Money that might be devoted to such investments is instead being spent by a worried public on buying the stuff in plastic bottles. It made sense in West Virginia in recent weeks, but in general, according to Jackson, in spite of all the good reasons to be concerned about drinking water safety, resorting to bottles is not a sensible reflex. “People think bottled water is safer, but there is zero evidence that is true,” he said. “The quality of water in city tap water is regulated far more closely than bottled water.”
Living With Dirty Water
Heavy pollution of river water by household and industrial waste in the Indonesian province of West Java is threatening the health of at least five million people living on the riverbanks, say government officials and water experts.
Poor sanitation and hygiene cause 50,000 deaths annually in Indonesia, with untreated sewage resulting in over six million tons of human waste being released into inland water bodies, according to an ongoing study by the World Bank.
Ibu Sutria, 53, lives in a wooden shack on the banks of West Java’s Krukut River, which runs approximately 20km south from the capital, Jakarta, to the city of Depok. “Sometimes the river is clean, sometimes it’s dirty,” she said. Sutria suffers from regular bouts of stomach ache and diarrhoea, and says the river is constantly flooded.
“People use the river for a toilet and children play in it because they have nowhere else to swim.” She and others in her community use nearby ground water to wash themselves because they think it is cleaner than river water.
Pak Jumari, 35, is a leader of a community group living along the Ciliwung River, which runs north for 97km from the West Java city of Bogor. Since 2010 he has been using a boat to keep his own section of the Ciliwung clean by scooping out rubbish. “We find many detergents and soaps in the river, “he said. “We no longer use it for washing or drinking.”
Fishermen on the Ciliwung use “blast fishing” – bombs made of kerosene and fertilizer to kill fish so they are easier to catch – which has worsened pollution. Nevertheless, his community still fishes in the river, with few reported ill effects, he said.
Reasons for pollution
The Deputy Minister of the Indonesian Environment Ministry, Hendri Bastaman, told IRIN that pollution in West Java’s rivers is worsening, particularly in the Ciliwung and Citarum, where five million people live along the riverbanks.
“Much of the waste is dumped into rivers from households,” said Bastaman. “People are using these rivers as personal toilets. We’ve also found mercury in river water, which we suspect is coming from companies or those running small-scale mining activities close to the rivers.”
Health risks
Muhammad Rez Sahib, advocacy coordinator of KRuHA, a Jakarta-based coalition of more than 30 Indonesian NGOs focusing on safe water access, said none of the capital’s rivers could be viewed as safe for human use.
“Even the water suppliers in Jakarta don’t use the water here because it is so polluted,” he said. “Instead, they use water from the Citarum River, which is also heavily polluted. Even after this water is treated it’s still unsafe to drink.” The Citarum flows north from Bandung, the capital of West Java, for approximately 300km to the Java Sea.
Safe water alternatives for poor communities are “few and far between” Sahib noted. “Many will turn to use ground water, but due to a poor sewage system and open defecation, 90 percent of ground water in Jakarta is contaminated by E.coli bacteria. Many infant deaths are caused by this bacteria – E.coli is the main threat to human life from these rivers.”
Edward Carwardine, spokesperson for the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) in Indonesia, noted that in West Java the use of “improved water” – obtained from taps, boreholes, covered wells and springs – falls below the national average, with only half of the population (approximately 20 million) able to access it.
“When families don’t have access to improved water sources, disease is much more likely,” said Carwardine. “Nearly a quarter of all deaths amongst children under five in Indonesia are caused by diarrhoeal disease.”
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that nationwide more than 20,000 children in this age group die every year from diarrhoea.
Dengue fever and malaria, both spread by mosquitoes that thrive in stagnant water, account for an additional 3 percent of overall child deaths, according to Carwardine, who said more focus is needed to end the widespread practice of defecating in the open.
The Environment Ministry’s Bastaman said the government is using educational campaigns to raise awareness of the dangers of unsafe water and to end defecation in rivers.
“For the Ciliwung we have a 10-year plan to restore the river’s health,” said Bastaman. “But for the Citarum, it’s impossible to get it back to the way it was prior to being polluted. The pollution is just too much.”
Despite arsenic, Tombstone water taps keep running
-By Andrew Schaeffer/Arizona-Sonora News Service originally posted on September 22, 2011
Arsenic levels in Tombstone’s tap water have increased because the town’s supply of mountain water has been reduced and well usage increased, but residents continue to drink from the faucet.
“I’ve lived here for 17 years, and I’ve always drank right from the tap,” said Kari Lord, manager of Tombstone General Store. “Everyone I know still drinks from the tap, too.”
The store is one of the few local sellers of bottled water, but Lord said she has not seen an increase in the demand for their imported water.
“I don’t think it’s a big deal,” she said. “And I think the rest of the town feels the same way.”
Susan Addison, an owner of Ike’s Mini Market, agreed. Her gas station/mini-mart also has free tap water for patrons, and she said people still come in to get that over bottled water.
“I still drink it,” she said. “The water’s been passed by the state. I think it’s still safe. It’s just higher levels of arsenic.”
Tombstone normally mixes its arsenic-rich well water with water pumped from three springs in the Huachuca Mountains. The pipes transporting that water to Tombstone, however, were damaged after this summer’s Monument Fire and subsequent floods in the mountain.
Addison said she was concerned about the town’s water situation but more over the amount of water available than its quality. If a large fire broke out in town, for example, officials may not have enough water to put it out and provide enough drinking water for the residents.
She said she hopes the $50,000 state grant the city received to pay the town’s new public works project manager to repair pipelines from the springs will help.
“One pipe [from the springs] is flowing already,” she said.
Addison said there are stories circulating around town about people and dogs getting sick from the water, but “I still haven’t seen anybody glowing in the dark.”
With the tourist season picking up again, the issue of the visitors’ safety comes into play.
Ron Arko, owner of the Tombstone Motel, said he was unaware of the heightened levels.
“If it were a big deal, we’d all be dead,” he said, laughing.
Arko said he’ll continue to drink water from the tap.
One local beverage seller has turned the arsenic news into a new business venture.
Johnny Fields said he had the idea to sell bottled water for some time, but did not get started until the pipes from the Huachuca Mountains were damaged.
His sarsaparilla business has now expanded to include bottled water adorned with a skull and crossbones.
Though the label on his “Tombstone Tolerable Water” says is from local wells and advises to “drink at your own risk,” the liquid is not from an old Tombstone mine.
“It’s from Phoenix,” Fields said through a grin. “I’m not selling water full of arsenic.” He added that the mine on the bottle does not even exist.
Business started slowly two months ago when he started selling the water, but it is beginning to pick up, he said.
“People pick this up and chuckle,” he added. “If everything I sell makes people smile or laugh, I’m happy.”
The Top 10 Worst Water Cities in the US
-by Pelican Water, originally posted on January 5, 2015
Most Americans believe their drinking water is safe from unhealthy levels of chemicals and contaminants. According to a report from the website 24/7 Wall St, this isn’t necessarily the case. Profiled by NBC News, the study looked at 48,000 communities across 45 states. It showed that a number have drinking water with chemicals and pollutants that exceed limits set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The Ten Worst Offenders
To assess overall water quality, communities were ranked based on total percentage of chemicals found, total number of contaminants found, and the most dangerous average level of a single pollutant. Based on the organization’s findings, the following cities stood out for having the worst drinking water:
- Jacksonville, FL: With 23 different toxins, including high volumes of carcinogenic trihalomethanes, lead and arsenic, Jacksonville’s water appears to be anything but pure. In fact, during one test, trihalomethane levels were two times the EPA legal limit.
- San Diego, CA: The country’s eighth-largest city provides water to numerous residents. Unfortunately, 24/7 Wall St says that water contains at least 20 contaminants, including two chemicals that exceeded the EPA’s legal limit.
- North Las Vegas: Mostly fed by groundwater and the Colorado River, North Las Vegas’s water supply didn’t contain any chemicals exceeding legal limits. It did, however contain a total of 26 contaminants, including high levels of radioactive uranium.
- Omaha, NE: Fed by the Missouri and Platte Rivers, Omaha’s water supply contained at least four chemicals above legal amounts, including manganese, nitrate and nitrite, trihalomethanes and atrazine, a herbicide linked to human birth defects.
- Houston, TX: The fourth-largest U.S. city gets its water from Lake Houston, the San Jacinto Rivers and the Trinity River. Within this water, over 46 pollutants were detected, including radioactive alpha particles and haloacetic acids from disinfection byproducts.
- Reno, NV: In addition to arsenic and manganese, Reno’s water supply was found to contain eight chemicals at levels above EPA health guidelines, including tetrachloroethylene, an industrial solvent and dry cleaning chemical.
- Riverside County, CA: A 7,200-square-mile area located north of San Diego, Riverside County gets its water from the Bay Delta. Within that water, 13 chemicals were found that exceeded recommended health guidelines.
- Las Vegas, NV: Fed by the Colorado River, Las Vegas’ water supply contained 12 pollutants exceeding EPA health guidelines, including lead, arsenic, radium-228 and radium-226.
- Riverside, CA: In addition to the same problems facing county residents, Riverside city residents drink an unusually unhealthy water supply containing 15 chemicals that exceeded health guidelines, along with traces of uranium and bromoform.
- Pensacola, FL: Situated along the Gulf of Mexico on the Florida Panhandle, Pensacola ranks as having the worst water quality in the country, thanks to 45 total chemicals. Of these, 21 were found at unhealthy amounts, with the worst being lead, benzene, tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, radium-228 and -228. Pensacola’s water was also found to contain chloroform and cyanide.
The best way to ensure that your home’s water is protected from harmful contaminants is with a Pelican Whole House Water Filter. This industry-leading system filters out microorganisms at the point of entry to the home, adding an extra layer of protection against contaminated municipal water supplies.
Baltimore City Public Schools’ CEO Announces System-wide Shift to Bottled Drinking Water
City of Baltimore Press Release, originally posted on July 2007
BALTIMORE –Baltimore City Public School System CEO Dr. Andrés Alonso announced a system-wide shift to bottled drinking water for students, teachers, staff, and visitors today. The shift is expected to be completed by Friday, November 9. The re-evaluation of the overall policy was prompted by new testing that found several water fountains that had passed previous tests for lead and were permitted to return to use had subsequently failed.
“Parents, students, and teachers prefer the bottled water,” said Dr. Alonso. “Maintenance of the existing water fountains is not worth the expense and concern. It is more cost effective to provide bottled water than to continue to flush, test, and review hundreds of water fountains across the school system each year.”
Recent random testing by the health department found lead levels in water fountains to be much improved from 2003 when all the fountains across the system were shut down. However, despite the school system’s best efforts to maintain the water fountains and to make them fully operational, a small percentage failed to meet the cutoff levels.
The Baltimore City Health Department collected samples of water from working fountains in 10 randomly selected schools, all of which also offered bottled water to students. The laboratory of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene performed the tests.
Of 84 working fountains tested at all 10 schools, 74 had levels of lead below the cutoff level of 20 parts per billion. However, 10 fountains had levels above the cutoff level. The fountains were immediately shut off.
“What concerned us was that the fountains that failed this time around all had previously passed tests, and all had replacement parts,” said Dr. Joshua M. Sharfstein, Commissioner of Health. “Since our goal is 100 percent confidence, the best approach is to switch to bottled drinking water.”
“We don’t want water fountains to be a distraction to the teaching and learning taking place in the classroom,” said Dr. Alonso. “We want to make sure our children, teachers, and staff have clean water to drink so we can concentrate on education.”
A financial review showed that the cost of bottled drinking water for the school system is expected to be approximately $675,000 per year. By comparison, the school system is paying approximately $350,000 for bottled water in schools without adequate numbers of working fountains, $275,000 for staff and consultants to oversee the testing program, and $50,000 for laboratory analysis. In addition, hundreds of custodians spend time flushing each water fountain every day, and many other school system and health department employees are involved in reviewing and approving results.
In the future, exceptions may be granted on a school-by-school basis, such as for schools that have entirely new piping and fixtures.
Summary of Health Department Testing Results
The Health Department conducted testing at all available working fountains at 10 randomly selected schools in October 2007. The testing was performed by the laboratory of the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. All 10 schools had at least some bottled water available on site.
- Of 84 drinking fountains tested, the water in 74 fountains (88%) passed the test, with lead levels less than 20 parts per billion. ¾ In 10 fountains (12%) located in four schools, the water failed the test, with the lead content exceeding 20 parts per billion of lead. Five of these fountains had lead levels exceeding 100 parts per billion, with the highest at 655 parts per billion of lead.
- Fountains that tested high for lead were immediately shut off.
- The four schools with at least one fountain that failed the test already had a total of 54 water coolers with bottled drinking in use. An additional 15 coolers were delivered.
Overall, the results were much improved from several years ago. At these 10 schools, after the systemwide shutdown in 2003, 69 fountains had tested high for lead and had never been turned back on.
It is not immediately clear why the 10 fountains tested high for lead. All 10 fountains had replacement parts. All had previously passed the test, under conditions designed to elicit the highest possible results. Eight of the fountains had failed the lead test at some point in the past, followed by normal tests. Two of the 10 fountains had passed all tests since the 2003 shutdown.
- According to experts consulted by the Health Department, one possibility is that even when fountains have been fixed, there can still be problems upstream, such as in the pipes.
Based on the results, and the high cost of further evaluating and remediating the water fountains of the school system, the Health Department recommended a system-wide switch to bottled drinking water. Exemptions in the future could be considered on a school-by-school basis.
- Schools tested without high lead levels: Hampden Elementary (6 pass), Lombard Middle (16 pass), Gardenville Elementary (3 pass), Canton Middle (6 pass), Cross Country Elementary (7 pass), Patterson High (18 pass).
- Schools tested with at least one fountain with high lead level: Northwood Elementary (3 pass, 41, 87), Douglas High School (5 pass, 280, 655), Baltimore City College (1 pass, 267, 410), Carver High School (9 pass, 31, 47, 75, 142)